After my last session at the Curtin Business School Centre
for Entrepreneurship, the participants asked for a few extras. I should have
charged them a standard and exorbitant consulting fee, but, unfortunately, it
would have been a counter-profile request.
My profile: extraverted, intuitive, feeling, perceiver,
ENFP. What it means in practice is that I am a bit of a dreamer hippy idealist
type and money is peripheral and not an aim.
First question: How do we implement this knowledge in
business?
Damn good question and the answer will, naturally, depend on
your own profile and the rest of the puzzle that has gone into making you who
you are.
For example, remember the four intelligences of the model of
four, the temperament model, the one based on what drives us?
The Improvisor-SP has a tactical intelligence so he or she
will probably just dive in without any preparation but take particular note of
body language and try to find ways of working with colleagues or employees while
in full participation mode. And probably make sure they have some fun with
their new knowledge.
The Stabiliser-SJ has a logistical intelligence and this
person might note the salient points, then create a time-line of
to-be-implemented instructions, guidelines, work books.
The Theorist-NT has a strategic intelligence and these folks
might analyse, make a strategic plan that could be an integral part of a
broader plan, then implement it, in particular if they were an ENTJ, or lose
the plan, if they were an ENTP.
The Catalyst-NF has a diplomatic and emotional intelligence and
given these people are my brothers and sisters, better just write what I would
do. It is also important to remember that my NF profile is tempered by other
components – I am a man, grew up in a small town on a farm and in a shop, spent
first 16 years an intense Christian, was a hippy for as long and for most of my
life I have kept a journal.
First thing I would do, is nothing, almost, because although
an extravert, I am a reflective version. I would return to my workplace, be a
little less conversational and observe. After work, even during, I would make
notes. At night I would attempt to line up my notes with my new knowledge and
look for commonality, characteristics I shared with each individual in the
workplace, so I could attempt connections.
Now for some general tips.
- Read the Know Yourself Booklet, particularly pages 10 -13,
22 – 29.
- Jung’s type gives you a template with which to work
through personality conflicts
Rather than saying: “He’s a prick
and I refuse to work with him.”
You could say: “Hang on, it looks like you are the kind of person who likes precise detail and you do not take things personally. Whereas I am big picture and tend to be a bit sensitive.”
You could say: “Hang on, it looks like you are the kind of person who likes precise detail and you do not take things personally. Whereas I am big picture and tend to be a bit sensitive.”
- Always useful to remember that relationships are inevitably
negotiated settlements.
And now here are a few key questions to ask to help
determine, or guess, a person’s type.
So when we meet, would you like
me to tell you everything (Ext), or would you prefer notes on paper (Int)?
(If “yes” to notes)
You want extensive notes? Dot
points? Graphics? Big picture stuff (iNTu) or concentrate on detail (Se)?
(If “yes” to tell me)
How much time do you have to
meet, because I can could go on for hours?
Thinking and feeling preferences you can put out feelers, or
pointers.
Current
analysis suggests the bottom line means we have to close the business down (Thi).
That’s a very good suggestion but
what about the impact on staff (Fee)?
With this dichotomy, you can always get an idea in a
preamble to a meeting, or conversation. Are they interested in talking about
personal matters, or do they just want to get on with it?
If you look through the “Know Yourself” booklet, almost any
of the listed characteristics can be turned to a question.
Examples.
Breadth and depth: Have you got a
lot of friends (Ext), or just a couple of very close mates (Int)?
Justice and mercy: That guy who
got 10 years, I mean, that was the maximum, so he should have expected it
(Thi). or: He was pushed, his wife had only recently died and his cat was run
over. I think the court was a bit harsh. (Fee)
If you have a dilemma, flick me an email. – jon@doust.com.au
There’s more, but I’m going to end here. Next instalment
soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment